Vakken
Engels
Frans
Duits
Spaans
Nederlands
Grieks
Portugees
Italiaans
Latijn
Japans
Biologie
Aardrijkskunde
Natuur- en scheikunde
Wiskunde, rekenen
Economie
Geschiedenis
Eigen methodes
Alle vakken
Home
›
Alle vakken
›
Eigen methodes
›
Grandes Lignes havo vwo 1A
› 3 Law and Management
Helaas is de overhoormodule niet beschikbaar. Wel kun je deze lijst overhoren via StudyGo. Klik op 'Overhoren'
Grandes Lignes havo vwo 1A
, deel 2
3 Law and Management
Jaar 4 (mavo)
Link voor email / website
Link naar overhoring, zonder bewerk/reactiemogelijkheid (ELO)
Open met deze code de oefening in miniTeach
Twitter
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
Harris v. Birkenhead Corporation = council failed to board up council house, child entered through unsecured door and fell from window - not necessarily physical occupier Wheat v. Lacon & Co = defendants owned pub, however was run by manager and wife, guest died after falling from staircase - multiple occupiers Bailey v. Armes = couple lived above supermarket, child plays on rooftop, friend of child falls from rooftop - none of mutliple occupers liable Revill v. Newberry = claimant and accomplice sneak onto land intending to steal, defendant shoots one in the arm - shows how damage needs to be relevant to the fact that one is the occupier McGeown v. Northern Island Housing Executive = claimant walked along public footpah, tripped in hole - right of way was owed no duty Darby v. National Trust = man drowned while swimming in NT pond - obvious risk so no need for common duty of care Tedstone v. Bourne Leisure = claimant slips on water that had been spilled over from jacuzzi, clean 5 min before - no reasonable system could have dealt with the unusual spillage so quickly Jolley v. London Borough of Sutton = kids find abandoned boat, start to fix it, boat collapses and leaves kid paralysed - counil should have removed boat to protect for children who know ways to get themselves into danger Glasgow Corporation v. Taylor = child dies from eating poisonous berries - breached duty of care Phipps v. Rochester Corporation = young children play in open land, fall into deep trench break legs - adults would have foreseen danger , parents have overriding responsibility here Roles v. Nathan = chimney sweeps were killed by monoxide gas - professionals to be aware of particular dangers Haseldine v. Daw = claimant was killed as lift plunged down - impossible for occupier to check for correct work Woodward v. Mayor of Hastings = claimant slips on a step covered in snow - liable as it's easy to check whether reasonable care has been taken British Railways Board v. Herrington = kids play on railway entering through gap in the fence, BRB knew and did not take measures - duty of common humanity Keown v. Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust = child 11 injured climbing fire escape - child old enough to realise the risk that came with it White v. St Albans City = short cut across car park, fell into trench, no evidence that council was aware - no duty imposed Tomlinson v. Congleton Borough Council = claimant left paralysed due to diving into shallow water - risk was obvious to any adult
Ingezonden op 26-05-2016 - 479x bekeken.
Nog niet genoeg stemmen voor waardering: geef je mening!
voting system
1
2
3
4
5
Maak gratis account aan
Toon volledig menu
Door deze site te gebruiken, ga je akkoord met het gebruik van cookies voor analytische doeleinden, gepersonaliseerde inhoud en advertenties.
Meer informatie.
Overhoor en verbeter je talenkennis op woordjesleren.nl. De grootste verzameling van Franse, Engelse, Duitse en anderstalige oefeningen. Naast talen zijn ook andere vakken beschikbaar, zoals biologie, geschiedenis en aardrijkskunde!