Helaas is de overhoormodule niet beschikbaar. Wel kun je deze lijst overhoren via StudyGo. Klik op 'Overhoren'

Grandes Lignes havo vwo 1A

4 Law and Management

Jaar 3 (havo/vwo)

Carlill v. Carbolic Smokeball (1893) = flue smokeballs - unilateral contract
Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) = it may be prepared to sell the house to you - invitation to treat, merely one step in the negotiations for a contract
Partridge v. Crittenden (1968) = selling of endangered hens and cocks - invitation to treat, advertisement
Fisher v. Bell (1960) = selling of flick knives - invitation to treat, shopping
Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots (1953) = selling medicine that needed pharmaceutical supervision, not at shelves but at till - invitation to treat, shopping
Ramsgate v. Montefiore (1866) = applied for shares, paying a deposit, did not hear from them for 5 months, was asked to remain outstanding balance, refuses - termination of offer, reasonable time
Hyde v. Wrench (1840) = defendant sells house for 1000 but the claimant replied by offering to buy it at 950 - termination of offer, counter-offer
Harvey v. Facey (1893) = sent telegram asking what the lowest prices was, replied stating the lowest price, not necessarily making na offer, just responding to a request for information - termination of offer, request for information
Byrne v. Leon van Tienhoven (1880) = shows how offer can be withdrawn if it's communicated - termination of offer, withdrawal
Dickinson v. Dodds (1876) = heard from a third party that seller went for a different offer - termination of offer, withdrawn by offeror or some other reliable source
Brogden v. Metropolitan Rail (1877) = supplies coal to railway company without formal contract, makes draft contract but disappears in drawer, however by continuing the supply in the terms of the contract it was held that they accepted - acceptance, conduct
Felthouse v. Bindley (1862) = nephew and uncle selling horse - acceptance, silence cannot be acceptance unless it's absolutely clear that acceptance was intended
Butler Machine Tool v. Ex-Cell (1979) = example of battle of firms with last shot (acknowledgement slip) - acceptance, battle of forms
Entores v. Miles For East (1955) = instant communication rule shows where acceptance took place (in London ) - acceptance, exceptions to communication rule
The Brimnes (1975) = telexed withdrawal of a ship from a charter party within office hours - acceptance, exception to communication rule
Adams v. Lindsell (1818) = claimant sent acceptance by post but was misdirected so took longer than expected, court held that contract was concluded as soon as the acceptance was posted - acceptance, postal rule
Household Fire Assurance v. Grant (1879) = defendant posted an offer to buy shares, acceptance was posted back but never arrived, defendant received dividends - acceptance, postal rule
Holwell Securities v. Hughes (1974) = defendants offered to sell a house but the offer stated that the acceptance had to be 'by notice in writing', claimants posted acceptance but never reached, court held that notice meant communication not posting - acceptance, exception postal rule

Ingezonden op 27-05-2016 - 453x bekeken.
Nog niet genoeg stemmen voor waardering: geef je mening!

voting system
1
2
3
4
5

Vakken

Grandes Lignes havo vwo 1A

4 Law and Management